Sudan and
the Democratic Republic of the Congo received £2.4m in training and support for
military and defence staff
 |
Sudan's Omar al-Bashir, who has been indicted for genocide, war crimes and crimes against humanity by the international criminal court. Photograph: Ibrahim Usta/AP
|
The UK
government has spent millions of pounds on training military, police and
security personnel from oppressive regimes that have arms embargoes in place,
the Guardian has learned.
In the last
five years, Sudan and the Democratic Republic of the Congo have received from
the UK government £2.4m between them in training and support for military and
defence personnel.
Sudan is
the only country in the world where the sitting president, Omar al-Bashir, has
been indicted for genocide, war crimes and crimes against humanity by the
international criminal court, while in Congo extensive human rights abuses,
including extra-judicial killings and torture, have been documented.
The Enough Project, which works with the American actor George Clooney to expose human
rights abuses in both Sudan and Congo, says the two countries are the scene of
some of the world's most serious mass atrocities.
In
information revealed in a freedom of information response from the Ministry of Defence a total of £75,406 has been spent on providing 44-week courses at the
elite Royal Military Academy Sandhurst for Sudanese and Congolese forces. Other
support includes military logistics, advanced command and staff courses,
strategic intelligence and evaluating challenges to state sovereignty.
A total of
£952,301 was spent on international peace support, which includes border
security and stabilisation.
Much of the
current focus of concern about human rights abuses in Sudan centres on conflict
in the border areas with the newly formed country of South Sudan, such as Blue
Nile, Nuba Mountains and South Kordofan, and the ongoing conflict in Darfur,
where documented genocide shows 300,000 Darfuris have been killed and up to 4
million displaced. The Sudanese government has refused humanitarian aid access
to the border areas.
In Congo
many and varied human rights abuses have been documented, especially against
opponents of the president, Joseph Kabila. A UN report earlier this year
highlighted "serious human rights violations, including killings,
disappearances and arbitrary detentions" during last November's
presidential elections. At least 33 people were killed by government forces
during the elections, and hundreds were arrested and said they had been
tortured. A delegation of UK officials has been investigating claims of torture
in Congo and is due to report back shortly.
A leading
Sudanese exile based in the UK, Dr Gebreil Fediel from Darfur, is challenging
the legality of the UK government's relationship with Sudan in the high court
next month.
His legal
team is bringing enforcement proceedings against the government for failing to
provide him with protection under the refugee convention and travel documents
to enable him to attend peace talks around the world. These talks aim to bring
an end to the appalling human rights situation in Sudan. He is the leader of a
major Sudanese opposition movement, the Justice and Equality Movement.
The high
court judge Mr Justice Wyn Williams described the government's approach to
Fediel as "unreasonably restrictive" in January of this year.
In a
statement to the court Fediel accused the government of failing to provide him
with protection because there was a deal between the two governments.
"I
believe the government of Sudan is requesting the UK government to treat me
like this for political reasons. Their decisions to exclude and restrict me are
underpinned by political and intelligence considerations."
He
expressed concern about the military support and training provided by the UK:
"If it was and is the intention of the UK authorities to teach Sudan's
police and security officers how to conduct these matters in a democratic
manner, it has failed. The brutality and genocidal activities of government of
Sudan state organs against its own citizens is widely documented."
In July the
Foreign Office minister Lord Howell admitted about Sudan: "There is ample
evidence that the military tactics being used raise concerns that the most
serious crimes of concern to the international community may be being
committed."
Fediel said
that as well as the UK's provision of military support to his government the UK
had also been providing support and training to Sudanese police and security
officials. He said that in May a group of senior police officers came to the UK
for training.
A letter
from the former Foreign Office minister Ivan Lewis in 2010 stated: "The UK
has a large police support programme in Democratic Republic of the Congo."
Aaron Hall,
the associate director of research for the Enough Project, said: "We would
hope that any nation providing military and security support to these countries
would have conditions attached to that support based on the adherence to
international human rights laws and standards. If credible evidence exists that
shows violation of those laws and standards whether within those countries
borders or externally, we would urge those governments providing support to
immediately suspend that support, and further to work with international and
regional partners to hold those responsible for human rights abuses accountable
for their actions."
Jovanka
Savic, Fediel's solicitor, said: "There is an obligation under
international law that requires states to bring to an end breaches of
international law through legal means. This new evidence suggests that the UK
is not helping to do this but is instead giving aid and assistance to the
Sudanese government in a way that could be in breach of its international legal
obligations. It is very concerning that support is being offered to DRC where
many human rights abuses have been documented."
She said
the UK's actions against Fediel, in preventing or restricting him from
attending peace talks around the world, was helping to prolong the human
suffering and conflict in Sudan.
"They
are making this man's life very difficult for political and arguably illegal
reasons," she said.
The
government provided a response from four departments – the Home Office, the
Ministry of Defence, the Foreign Office and the Department for International
Development.
A spokesman
said: "Strict criteria are applied to any training to ensure that it
complies with overseas security and assistance human rights guidance. For each
funding decision an assessment of the risk of human rights abuses is carried
out. Her Majesty's government conducts continual assessment of its programmes
and human rights compliance is a cardinal criterion of this.
"UK
officials have contact with international criminal court indictees only when
this is considered essential and on a case-by-case basis. No contact with
President Bashir has come about as a result of these programmes."
However,
the spokesman confirmed that some meetings had taken place between the previous
and present ambassador to Sudan and Bashir. "The main occasions are when a
British ambassador leaves or takes up their post in Khartoum."
The
spokesman said that international peace support was delivered to UN
peacekeeping missions in Sudan and South Sudan and funding was provided for the
African Union panel leading the talks aimed at ending the conflict.
He
confirmed that nine senior national police officers from Sudan visited London
in May to learn about policing and human rights in the UK, two of whom held the
rank of major general. "The officers met the Sudanese ambassador at his
London office as a protocol courtesy." He said that community policing
initiatives had been set up following the officers' return to Sudan.
Studies
have shown that Congolese soldiers are responsible for at least 60% of reported
rapes in the country. Last year the UN implicated them in the rape of at least
121 women over three days in the village of Nyakiele, in South Kivu province.
This came after the gang-rape of at least 47 women by government troops in
North Kivu.
The UN's
high commissioner for human rights has said: "The Congolese army remains
responsible for a significant number of human rights violations, including
sexual violence.''
The
opposition Union for Democracy and Social Progress (UDPS) was at the sharp end
of last year's election crackdown and claims soldiers were used to intimidate
voters and interfere with ballot papers. It expressed concern at the use of
British resources to train and support the military.
Albert
Moleka, the party's cabinet director and spokesman, said: "Training is a
normal part of the co-operation of our two countries but we might say it is the
responsibility of the DRC to use those who have been trained properly. That can
only be done by a legitimate political authority. Unfortunately we don't have a
legitimate political authority. There is a huge gap of mistrust between the
army and the population."
He added:
"In our experience it is the elite troops with the best equipment who are
used against the population. I think military co-operation should be attached
with strict conditions that ensure force is never used against the people. That
is difficult for outside countries to monitor."
Moleka said
there was a long tradition of Congo's military elite studying at academies in
Britain and other foreign countries. "But when they come back, what
functions do they occupy? How can they help their country? They're not given
the opportunity to bring what they learn to change the attitudes and behaviour
of the army."
The
Congolese army, badly paid and fed, is still struggling to maintain discipline
after the integration of a Tutsi rebel militia following a 2009 peace treaty.
Yet the international community, including the world's biggest UN peacekeeping
operation, has put faith in it to quell violence in the country's war-torn
east.
In May,
Human Rights Watch reported that Sudanese government forces were carrying out
indiscriminate bombings and abuses against civilians in southern Kordofan. It
called on Sudan to investigate the discovery of a cluster bomb in the region.
Witnesses interviewed in Blue Nile also described serious abuses by the armed
forces. The onslaughts have created tens of thousands of refugees living in appalling conditions.
John
Ashworth, a church adviser who has lived in Sudan and South Sudan for three
decades, said: "While one might argue that helping an army to maintain
professional standards could improve their human rights record, this is clearly
not the case with the Sudanese army, which continues to commit atrocities
against civilians in Darfur, the Nuba Mountains and Blue Nile, and continues to
threaten its new neighbour, South Sudan."
Ishag
Mekki, a Darfur refugee in Britain who campaigns for the region, said: "It
is shame that the UK government behaves irresponsibly and assists a war crime
government. It is an ethical matter not to stand firmly with victims of both
countries. I am annoyed seeing ministers and government officials visit the UK
on a regular basis for various businesses, but to train them is shocking. It
means the people of Darfur will have to wait very long to persuade this
government to change their mind."
Pascal
Kambale, DRC country director of the Open Society Initiative for West Africa,
said: "I don't think this is appropriate at all. The Congolese army badly
needs complete reform and western donors – including the UK – have completely
failed on their promise to help the Congolese government's effort to reform its
army. Throwing this kind of big money into training not only is not in line
with security sector reform programmes. It is also counterproductive because it
comforts the Congo government into its lack of interest in reforming its
army."
Related Article:
“ … There’s much violence and anger throughout the world; when we look at the Middle East, we can see that changes are coming there. The West has a lot of power over the Middle East, but that power will begin to dissolve. The Muslim people of this world will begin to have their own power, and their own prosperity, and they will begin to disconnect from the Western World. This disconnection doesn’t have to be violent as violence only happens when somebody hangs onto what doesn’t belong to them....
... What Military Energy means if we use an analogy: it would be like putting grinding paste into the oil of your motor car. Once you release these energies you will begin to feel lighter as you disconnect from this reality, and, you will find it easier and easier to release any other negative emotions. Military Energies are the core of all your problems...."