![]() |
| US student Lara Alqasem attends a hearing at Israel's Supreme Court in Jerusalem on October 17, 2018 (AFP Photo/Menahem KAHANA) |
Jerusalem (AFP) - Israel's supreme court on Thursday overturned an entry ban imposed on a US student over past support for a pro-Palestinian boycott campaign, leading to her release after more than two weeks of detention.
The
three-judge panel upheld Lara Alqasem's appeal against the ban, allowing the
22-year-old to take her place on a master's degree programme at Jerusalem's
Hebrew University, which had awarded her a scholarship.
The
interior ministry's decision to bar her from entry, the court ruled, "was
not within the bounds of reason and is revoked".
"The
Hebrew University of Jerusalem looks forward to welcoming our newest student,
Lara Alqasem, as she begins her MA in human rights and transitional justice at
our law school next week," the university said in a brief statement after
the court decision.
Alqasem
landed at Tel Aviv's Ben Gurion airport on October 2, but despite having a visa
she was not allowed to clear immigration due to a 2017 law barring supporters
of the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions (BDS) movement.
Ordered to
return to the United States, she decided instead to stay in Israel and
challenge the ban.
She has
since been in detention at the airport, while lower courts rejected two
appeals.
A
spokeswoman for the immigration authority said she was released from the
holding facility on Thursday evening.
Alqasem,
whose father is of Palestinian descent, had been president of a chapter of
Students for Justice in Palestine (SJP) during her undergraduate studies at the
University of Florida.
The group
has supported boycott campaigns against Israel.
In March
2017, Israel's parliament passed the law banning the entry of supporters of
BDS, a movement inspired by an international campaign against South Africa
before the fall of apartheid.
Alqasem
says she left SJP in 2017 and is no longer part of the BDS movement.
Alqasem's
lawyer argued before the supreme court that the state should apply common sense
when applying the law against BDS supporters.
"Why
would she want to enter Israel to call for a boycott?" Yotam Ben Hillel
asked.
Thursday's 28-page
ruling agreed.
"In
this case, denying the applicant's entry does not advance the purpose of the
law, and it is argued, for example, by the Hebrew University that it harms
Israeli academia," it said, going on to criticise the immigration
authorities.
"Since
the actions of the applicant do not establish sufficient grounds to prohibit
her entry into Israel, the inevitable impression is that the denial of the visa
granted to her is due to the political opinions she holds," it wrote, in a
slap for immigration authorities.
"Extreme and dangerous step"
"If
this is indeed the case, then this is an extreme and dangerous step that could
lead to the disintegration of the pillars on which democracy is built in
Israel," it added.
Interior
Minister Arie Deri, under whose ministry the immigration authority falls,
lashed out at the court in response.
"The
decision to allow the student who openly acts against the state of Israel to
remain in the country is a disgrace," he tweeted.
"I
shall look into how to prevent such a thing happening again."
Attorney
Ben Hillel said he hoped that Deri would reconsider his policy.
"Israel
has the right to control its borders, but that right does not give the ministry
of the interior unchecked power to turn away anyone it deems unwanted," he
wrote in a statement.
"Lara’s
case proves that thought-policing has no place in a democracy."

No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.